Just before what ended up being our 0-5 whitewash in India, Cricinfo’s Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan portrayed the series as Britain’s ‘most obvious opportunity’ to revamp their sad ODI record on the subcontinent. Indeed, you can’t spell Madhusudhan without the word ‘distraught’. As a matter of fact, Mr Ramakrishnan had a point in principle. India were without Virender Sehwag, Sachin Tendulkar, Zaheer Khan and Yuvraj Singh. Nonetheless, what the Indian media ignored was that the vacationer were additionally drained.
Alastair Cook’s group was missing James Anderson Stuart Expansive
In addition to Eoin Morgan, who has been our most useful ODI entertainer lately? We likewise missed the as of late resigned Andrew Strauss, who was the legend of Britain’s tie against India On the planet Cup. Truly, in any case, that the wounds were never liable to impact the outcome. There were more extensive issues in play – most eminently the way that Britain have forever been absolutely sad at restricted overs cricket in the subcontinent. It was forever been along these lines, and likely consistently will be.
On reflection it was fairly silly to expect Alastair Cook, a tenderfoot commander, to lead a group containing various newbies to triumph in outsider circumstances. Undeniably more experienced Britain groups have been full in ODIs against India, Sri Lanka and Pakistan. For what reason did we anticipate that this part should be any unique? Beating India at home, toward the start of the English harvest time, when the pitches were greener than Jonny Bairstow and Ben Stirs up, was to be expected. Furthermore, regardless of Britain’s 3-0 win, a few onlookers, including the misleading insightful Sanjay Manjrekar, saw how Britain battled against Ashwin and Jadeja. It was a brief look into what’s in store.
A few India fans have declared India’s 5-0 vengeance as proof
Britain would be whitewashed in a test series in India as well. Obviously, this is senselessness. Britain’s speed bowling is better than India’s and our batsmen play turn significantly better when there is no strain to score at five or six runs for every over. The most probable outcome, in the event that the two groups began a test series tomorrow, would be a 0-0 impasse. Britain have further developed extraordinarily in test matches abroad, however we’re actually all out jackasses in 50 over cricket. Recall that we lost the ODIs against Australia 1-6 in the wake of winning the Cinders in predominant design.
Britain’s essential issue is that our batsmen are excessively customary and traditional to prevail in 50 over cricket. Except for Pietersen, we can’t maneuver the strike and hit the ball toward holes. Nor are our batsmen especially capable at clearing the ropes. Ian Chime, for instance, has the very same issue as Michael Vaughan and Matt Earlier – both of whom are/were exquisite test batsmen, however absolutely unsatisfactory to present day one-day cricket. You won’t ever see as additional universal or tastefully satisfying drivers of the cricket ball, yet request that Earlier or Vaughan control singles or hit sixes and they’re completely lost. That is the reason they arrived at the midpoint of north of 40 in tests, yet mid-20s in ODIs.